[fpc-pascal]Question to the offical fpc book

James Mills prologic at prologitech.com
Wed Apr 30 13:38:39 CEST 2003

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:52:13PM +0200, Iv?n Montes wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>  > Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>  > > The search function will be added as soon as I have some time.
>  > > The ability for users to add comments will not be added since
>  > > that is not the idea of documentation. For this we have mailing
>  > > lists and forums.
>  >
>  > I think that this suggestion is quite good. First, the comments to the
>  > php functions contain often helpful hints and tricks. Further,
>  > suggestions and comments to the docs are very close to the contents.
>  > It's much harder to search the mailing lists and forum. I think also
>  > that such a system encourages users to comment the docs which is helpful
>  > to improve them. Maybe it's worth a try?
> I agree with Michael, at least partially.
> I don't think that a documentation like in php.net will be good for FPC main
> docs, however it could be a really good alternative to document the several
> specific APIs (OpenGL, MySQL, Win32 ...)
> Although I'd preffer a code repository in the style of the old SWAG ;)
> ciao, ivan
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

I have no idea what this discussion is about but I agree with Michael
anyway. And IHMO I think the documentation that exists already for FPC
is enough.


More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list