aitor.sm at wanadoo.es
Mon Jun 10 15:16:02 CEST 2002
For those of us that haven't read the ISO spec of Pascal, what feature
of Pascal from there currently unsupported would be nice to have?
There's nothing that I myself miss on it, except for the ability to
create 16-bit realmode DOS code, which seems to be considered beyond any
possibility, because of the way pointers are handled (4 bits, always
Marco van de Voort wrote:
>>It tries to stick to the standard; allthough it doesn't.
>>BTW. are there plans to make FreePascal compatible to standard Pascal?
>>I think at least the unextended standard (ISO 7185 from 1990) should be
>>supported in full.
More information about the fpc-pascal