[fpc-devel] [RFC] Modernising the FPC Release Process -- Proposal for Review

Michael Van Canneyt michael at freepascal.org
Fri Apr 17 16:31:19 CEST 2026



On Fri, 17 Apr 2026, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-devel wrote:

>
> On 4/17/26 5:10 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2026, Nikolay Nikolov via fpc-devel wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/17/26 4:32 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys via fpc-devel wrote:
>>>> On 2026-04-17 13:00, Marco van de Voort via fpc-devel wrote:
>>>>> And then we still have to find out if that concept works at all in the 
>>>>> FPC context.
>>>> 
>>>> And yet it works flawlessly on 10,000s of other open source projects (big 
>>>> and small). I simply don't know why you think FPC is so special that it 
>>>> will not work here.
>>> 
>>> FPC is special in the regard that it is a compiler and that it has an 
>>> extremely high coupling between compiler and rtl units. So, changes are 
>>> very interdependent. It's hard to separate them and treat them as 
>>> independent, because they're simply not.
>> 
>> So ? How is the proposed flow at odds with this ?
>> 
>> I would think rather the opposite: by doing a MR you ensure related commits 
>> remain together.
>
> I'm not sure I understand the question. Graeme's proposal includes squashing 
> commits.

That part I would definitely not take, we're agreed on that.

But this does not mean we should reject everything he proposes.

Michael.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list