[fpc-devel] [RFC] Modernising the FPC Release Process -- Proposal for Review

mailinglists at geldenhuys.co.uk mailinglists at geldenhuys.co.uk
Fri Apr 17 15:30:15 CEST 2026


On 2026-04-17 10:57, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel wrote:
> Merging to devel and/or fixes branch is then much easier: it already 
> groups commits that belong together.
> 
> By forcing a little more work upfront, we reduce the work later on, and 
> we'll
> not be stuck with a bazillion commits that no-one knows how to handle.
> 
> As I understand it, many people use the fixes_x branch, so it'll also 
> be
> tested a lot sooner.


I'm glad somebody gets it!!!


General observation:
 From an outsider’s perspective, it appears there was a migration from 
Subversion to Git without a corresponding shift in workflow. Many team 
members seem stuck in a "Subversion mentality" -- the idea that branches 
are expensive or merging is difficult -- none of which applies to Git.

Unfortunately, the FPC project seems to have stalled since the 
migration, and there is no clear consensus on how to properly leverage 
these new [2026] tools. Given that, I don't believe there is much more I 
can contribute at this stage. I’ll stay on the sidelines for now and 
hope for the best. And yes, I'm still happy to triage/review Merge 
Requests where I can. Could we at least get some triage labels added to 
the fpcsource project, as I suggested in the proposal?

Regards,
   Graeme


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list