[fpc-devel] [RFC] Modernising the FPC Release Process -- Proposal for Review
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Fri Apr 17 14:11:44 CEST 2026
On Fri, 17 Apr 2026, Marco van de Voort via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> Op 17-4-2026 om 11:57 schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
>>
>> It does: By better structuring - for example forcing the use of a MR -
>> we can assign a milestone when accepting MR's and we'll have an exact
>> list of MRs to go to fixes as well as devel.
>>
> /So much/ administrative overhead. And then we still have to find out if
> that concept works at all in the FPC context.
There is no administrative overhead. I'mm not proposing to work with epics,
stories and whatnot.
No: You create a branch, develop your thing, and push. That's it.
Press a button to merge.
The difference with before: we have a good record that's easier to handle.
And if we find it really does not work, we switch back. It's that simple.
> I would be against that.
No surprise there.
We see the world very differently. As far as I am concerned, the change to
gitlab has only been for the good. The number of merged merge requests is a
testimony to that.
Your last words in your mail clearly indicate you have a different view of that.
Probably a matter of glass half full/half empty.
Michael.
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list