[fpc-devel] APX instruction set

[Marģers .]

As well Linux kernel have direct patches from Intel and probably from AMD. FPC is not in race to outrun some. I have in mind to break one to one relationship of TAsmOp={$i x8664op.inc} and InsProp : array[tasmop] of TInsProp = {$i x8664pro.inc} That's what my question is about.   ----- Reply to message ----- Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] APX instruction set Date: trešd., 2025. g. 21. maijs 21:37 From: J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel < fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org> To: < fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org>   FPC is always going to be a bit behind the curve because gcc, for example, has corporate sponsors.  Heck, when I interviewed for a role at ARM (which I didn't get), they made clear that they help develop GCC and LLVM directly.  Can't easily compete with the actual CPU manufacturers contributing code!  Still, we do our best. One thing I'm trying to work on at the moment is auto-vectorisation.  Currently it's just for x86_64, but keeping things as generic as possible for AArch64 support too, and of course, for future Intel instruction sets. Kit  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20250522/c7537749/attachment.htm>