[fpc-devel] Another thread about the fact that official FPC releases are *unnecessarily* non-representative of the platforms it actually runs on
tsiegel at softcon.com
Sun Sep 27 23:45:48 CEST 2020
On 9/27/2020 3:50 PM, Florian Klämpfl via fpc-devel wrote:
> - there are little libraries being really IEEE compliant for float128
>>> - if they are IEEE compliant, their license does not allow to use the
>>> code in the FPC rtl.
I don't understand this statement.
How does having all the required functions for a certain kind of
compliance restrict anything? I was under the impression that if
someone wrote those functions from scratch that there was no licensing
issue. Where's the conflict in that case?
I've read most of the gpl licenses multiple times, and I've never seen
anything targeting compliance of any kind, What does this statement stem
from, and how does it apply to FPC code specifically?
This would seem to indicate that no gpl license code could ever obtain
compliance with certain standards, and I've seen more than once where
said code does just that. I don't get it.
Someone enlighten me please.
More information about the fpc-devel