[fpc-devel] Possible idea... "safe" subroutines/methods

[Jonas Maebe]

On 05/05/2019 14:51, Marģers . via fpc-devel wrote:
> As i understand this idea is another way around key word "volatile" in 
> order to allow compiler perform more optimization.
> Then why to go half way introducing "safe", when it's better introduce 
> "volatile". Not too long ago here was discussion about it, but it was 
> strongly rejected by core team.

As mentioned in a previous message, fpc trunk supports a volatile 
intrinsic: 
http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_Trunk#Support_for_.22volatile.22_intrinsic


Jonas