[fpc-devel] Unexpected behaviour with intermediate results
giuliano.colla at fastwebnet.it
Tue Jun 12 13:42:49 CEST 2018
Il 12/06/2018 02:07, J. Gareth Moreton ha scritto:
> Someone pointed out that if you perform "(x shl 8) shr 8", where x is
> of type Word, the result is always x, even though logic dictates that
> the upper 8 bits should be shifted out and hence the result actually
> be equal to "x and $FF".
IMHO logic dictates that (x shl 8) shr 8 should give x, because the shr
cancels the effect of shl, and that a further compiler optimization
might simply suppress the code at all. Register size when performing a
calculation is not dictated by logic, but by physical constraints, which
have nothing to do with logic.
If the programmer wishes to mask out some bits he should explicitly use
an *and* instruction, making the code both more readable and more
portable. Generating a less efficient code, with and instructions added
with the sole purpose of supporting the improper usage of a shl
instruction wouldn't be very smart.
I'm in favour of a compiler which generates the most efficient code, and
leaves to the programmer the responsibility to mask unwanted bits.
Just my 2 cents.
More information about the fpc-devel