[fpc-devel] AVR assembler code consistency checking

Christo christo.crause at gmail.com
Sat Jan 27 13:18:22 CET 2018

On Sat, 2018-01-27 at 10:18 +0200, Christo wrote:
> Another issue I've noticed is the case:   ldd r20, z+0 where the instruction is internally
> represented as ldd r20, z which is of course invalid syntax. I haven't had time to dig too
> deeply into this case since this seems like a very unlikely scenario to crop up (but it is a
> valid instruction according to the AVR instruction manual).

I've got a possible fix for this case, see patch attached to bug #33086.

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list