[fpc-devel] Multiple type sections - Far forward type declarations [feasible feature request?]

[Marco van de Voort]

In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> 
> With your extended "forward type resolution" this would no longer be possible.
> Theoretically it probably can, but multiple passes would be needed. 
> This would aversely affect the compiler speed.

Note that the example shows consecutive type blocks. They can be merged
simply by ignoring a TYPE while already in a type block.

This saves some trouble cause by header generators.