[fpc-devel] Different results of random(int32) and random(int64) for negative limit value
Jonas Maebe
jonas at freepascal.org
Wed May 24 20:10:15 CEST 2017
On 24/05/17 09:35, Thaddy de Koning wrote:
> The implementation is _*not *_undefined for negative values,_unless you
> say that you define it as undefined_.
That is exactly what "undefined" means: the implementation was not
designed to handle such values, so whatever you get as a result is
undefined.
Jonas
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list