[fpc-devel] Different results of random(int32) and random(int64) for negative limit value

Jonas Maebe jonas at freepascal.org
Sat May 20 15:46:38 CEST 2017

On 20/05/17 15:38, José Mejuto wrote:
> At least in 3.0 (trunk not tested as I don't have it compiled) the first 
> and second random numbers are always the same value, so:

That is unrelated to this thread, but has been fixed in FPC 3.0.2.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list