[fpc-devel] "Default" discussion for SmartPointers etc
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Wed Jul 27 16:42:54 CEST 2016
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2016:
>> Why not introduce an address operator ?
>> operator @ (T : MyType) : Pointer;
> It's only needed because Maciej wants the proxy type to behave differently
> from all other existing types. The solution is not to add functionality to
> make that easier, but to fix the inconsistencies.
Then I didn't understand what exactly you think is inconsistent ?
Knowing the purpose, what do you think can be done ?
More information about the fpc-devel