[fpc-devel] RTTI interface & variant late binding issue (mORMot)

Michael Van Canneyt michael at freepascal.org
Sat Feb 7 14:33:30 CET 2015

On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Sven Barth wrote:

>>> So in the end a manager approach as Jonas suggested might be the best 
>>> approach. Then we can for now
>>> implement the main platforms using libffi and implement full FPC ones one 
>>> at a time.
>> As long as we have no realiable approach to prevent people to violate the 
>> libffi license, I wouldn't
>> recommend to do so. Besides this I do not want either that every FPC 
>> compiled binary needs to come
>> with a libffi license text.
> Yes, the license might be the biggest problem here...

Forgive me my ignorance:
Where does it say that you need to ship the license with the binary ?


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list