[fpc-devel] Inconsistent use of Timeout in SimpleIPC

Ondrej Pokorny lazarus at kluug.net
Mon Dec 7 20:28:25 CET 2015

On 07.12.2015 20:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Denis Kozlov wrote:
>> On 6 December 2015 at 08:29, Ondrej Pokorny <lazarus at kluug.net> wrote:
>>> If you don't persist in using SimpleIPC, there is also AdvancedIPC 
>>> that uses
>>> the same approach (temporary files) across all targets and so it 
>>> behaves
>>> consistently.
>> I think SimpleIPC and AdvancedIPC complement each other. SimpleIPC
>> uses native IPC mechanisms, while AdvancedIPC uses a generic (file
>> based) mechanism. Both have advantages and disadvantages, so it's
>> great to have both available.
> +1

Interesting point! From this point-of-view I don't have to create the 
connection layer between SimpleIPC and AdvancedIPC as me&you suggested 
It makes sense.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list