[fpc-devel] Inconsistent use of Timeout in SimpleIPC

Denis Kozlov dezlov at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 18:08:03 CET 2015

On 6 December 2015 at 08:29, Ondrej Pokorny <lazarus at kluug.net> wrote:
> If you don't persist in using SimpleIPC, there is also AdvancedIPC that uses
> the same approach (temporary files) across all targets and so it behaves
> consistently.

I think SimpleIPC and AdvancedIPC complement each other. SimpleIPC
uses native IPC mechanisms, while AdvancedIPC uses a generic (file
based) mechanism. Both have advantages and disadvantages, so it's
great to have both available.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list