[fpc-devel] Suggestion: reference counted objects
mschnell at lumino.de
Mon Sep 22 14:58:24 CEST 2014
On 09/22/2014 02:51 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> Then you should also not use interfaces, strings and arrays, because
> they use the same mechanisms.
Yep. The advanced developer should know what he is doing.
> What us confusing there?
Of course I do know the pitfalls.
If fpc would provide a syntax for "parallel loop" and "future variables"
e.g. similar to what Prism offers, even more inexperienced users will be
inclined to use (invisible) threads. I suppose it's not possible to
avoid the "confusion" that is introduced by this, but it should be
limited as much as possible. (No idea how.)
More information about the fpc-devel