[fpc-devel] Suggestion: reference counted objects
Sven Barth
pascaldragon at googlemail.com
Sat Sep 20 13:42:53 CEST 2014
On 20.09.2014 13:11, Peter Popov wrote:
> Please do not reference count TObject. This is a uniquely bad and
> unnecessary idea. I will switch to ANSI C if you guys do it
Please enlighten me why you think it is bad. Give reasons and don't be
like "a farmer doesn't eat what he doesn't know" (rough translation of a
German proverb).
And just to give you a reason *for* reference counted objects: they
would finally allow to use operator overloads on classes, because then
temporarily created objects are created correctly (think about an
expression like "a * (b + c)" with classes).
Please also note that I said that I don't consider them to be the holy
grail especially considering that I know of some of the technial
problems one needs to face when implementing them in an already existing
language.
Regardts,
Sven
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list