[fpc-devel] DragonFly BSD x86-64 support --- patch sets ready for commit to trunk
John Marino
fpc-devel at marino.st
Tue Nov 25 12:29:14 CET 2014
On 11/23/2014 12:04, John Marino wrote:
> Hello,
> I've applied the DragonFly BSD support to the trunk. The 2.6.4 compiler
> can bootstrap it and it builds itself and helloworld.
>
> I've split it into 3 patch sets for the convenience of the committer:
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/df-fpc/dfly-support-existing-most.diff
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/df-fpc/dfly-support-existing-packages.diff
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/df-fpc/dfly-support-rtl-dragonfly.diff
>
> The first diff are modifications to existing files minus anything in
> packages. The second diff are modifications to existing files in
> packages. The third diff is the entire rtl/dragonfly directory minus a
> makefile.
>
> After committing,
> 1) all makefile needs need regenerated (and rtl/dragonfly/Makefile
> generated)
> 2) utils/fpcm/fpcmake.inc needs to be regenerated
>
> Notes:
> A) The change to compiler/cfileutl.pas is not intended to be
> permanent, but until I figure out why dircache isn't working, it's needed.
> B) (ignore)
> C) rtl/bsd/ostypes: changed S_IFMT and friends to octal. They were
> correct but octal is a lot easier to check than decimal -- headers are
> written in octal.
>
>
> I would be very elated if this could get committed prior to the next
> release as Free Pascal 2.6.4 is already available to via a derivative of
> the FreeBSD Ports Collection (called DPorts)
>
> Thanks to all who provided advise to get me here.
> Regards,
> John
I am wondering what the next step is. Are these patch sets currently
under review? Is anything more needed from me?
thanks,
John
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list