[fpc-devel] extend "unreachable code" warning for more cases?

Sergei Gorelkin sergei_gorelkin at mail.ru
Wed Feb 26 11:52:07 CET 2014


26.02.2014 13:28, Sven Barth пишет:
> Am 26.02.2014 09:41, schrieb Sergei Gorelkin:
>> 26.02.2014 12:09, Sven Barth пишет:
>>> Hello together!
>>>
>>> In context of Apple's recent security bug where a "goto fail;" at the wrong place disabled
>>> certificate checking or something along that lines I've thought whether it would 1) be worthwhile to
>>> extend FPC with the capability to detect such cases as well and 2) to see whether it would be
>>> currently feasible at all.
>>>
>>> So, how hard would it be to let the compiler detect cases like these:
>>>
>>> === code begin ===
>>>
>>> procedure Test1;
>>> begin
>>>    Writeln('Test1');
>>>    Exit;
>>>    Writeln('Test1');
>>> end;
>>>
>>> procedure Test2;
>>> label
>>>    stop;
>>> begin
>>>    Writeln('Test2');
>>>    goto stop;
>>>    Writeln('Test2');
>>> stop:
>>> end;
>>>
>>> === code end ===
>>>
>>> and of course potentially more complex ones...
>>>
>>> Also would you think it would be worthwhile to spend time on this?
>>>
>>
>> The definite assignment analysis ported by me four years ago
>> (http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=15523) detects all cases of unreachable code, except
>> backward goto's. Everything but backward goto's is almost trivial, backward goto's are more
>> complicated because they require multiple iterations over code tree, but are certainly feasible.
> Nice... does that code still work with current trunk?
Didn't test it, but should not be difficult to fix anyway.

> How does it look in light of Florian's recent work on SSA? (though it's not yet fully in trunk AFAIK)
They are probably two independent things. I've abandoned experiments with trying to use definite 
assignment analysis to determine variable lifetime.


Regards,
Sergei





More information about the fpc-devel mailing list