[fpc-devel] RFC: Support for new type "tuple" v0.1

[Paul Ishenin]

27.01.13, 1:43, Sven Barth wrote:
> Based on the results of the "for-in-index" thread I've decided to come
> up with a draft for the Tuple type which is thought by many people to be
> a better alternative to "for-in-index".

I think it is big overkill to implement a new base type for such a small 
task as returning a key in for-in loop.

And (for Michael) I don't see any beauty in this. Imo, initial index 
extension is much more beauty than suggested here (a,b,c) := d; 
constructions.

Best regards,
Paul Ishenin