[fpc-devel] Re: fpc-devel Digest, Vol 112, Issue 32
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl.fpc-devel at telemetry.co.uk
Mon Aug 26 19:45:08 CEST 2013
Steve wrote:
> >> We can agree on that at least, although I must say that C has
> >> improved a lot since K&R days.
>
> I'm afraid I can't agree on that one.
I think it's fair to say that nobody here /likes/ C, otherwise he'd not
be working on Pascal. But a few weeks ago I had to knock together a
Linux kernel module, and I will state as a fact that if C still had the
same level of syntax checking etc. that it had in the late '80s I'd
probably have failed dismally.
Of course, if I weren't bone idle I'd have investigated whether FPC has
the ability to target the kernel module format, although I'm fairly sure
that nobody's tried it on SPARC before now.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list