[fpc-devel] Build failure on win64
Sergei Gorelkin
sergei_gorelkin at mail.ru
Thu May 17 16:15:46 CEST 2012
17.05.2012 15:44, Jonas Maebe пишет:
>
> On 17 May 2012, at 13:39, Sergei Gorelkin wrote:
>
>> I've just encountered 'make clean all OPT=-dTEST_WIN64_SEH' in trunk failure:
>>
>> make ./msg2inc.exe
>> make[5]: Entering directory `C:/trunk/compiler'
>> C:/trunk/compiler/ppc3.exe -Ur -Xs -O2 -n -Fux86_64 -Fusystems -FuC:/trunk/rtl/units/x86_64-win64 -Fix86_64 -FE. -FUx86_64/units/x86_64-win64 -dRELEASE -dTEST_WIN64_SEH -dx86_64 -dGDB -dBROWSERLOG -Fux86 -Sew -Owdevirtcalls,optvmts -FwC:/trunk/compiler/pp1.wpo -OWdevirtcalls,optvmts -FWC:/trunk/compiler/pp2.wpo -dx86_64 -dGDB -dBROWSERLOG -Fux86 -Sew -FE. utils/msg2inc.pp
>> msg2inc.pp(823,1) Error: Undefined symbol: SYSUTILS$_$TMULTIREADEXCLUSIVEWRITESYNCHRONIZER_$__$$_DESTROY
>> msg2inc.pp(823,1) Fatal: There were 1 errors compiling module, stopping
>>
>> While I'm not entirely sure whether this is caused by my local changes, the failed command looks suspicious at least.
>> Isn't it plain wrong to use WPO information from compiler to optimize msg2inc, a completely independent executable?
>
> It indeed shouldn't be used for that. On the other hand, I don't understand why it would be recompiled during the WPO cycle, since how can the message files have changed since the last compilation of the regular cycle? (msg2inc should only be compiled if the message include files have to be regenerated)
>
This turned out to be a bug in 64-bit 'make' program that I was using. For some reason it started
thinking that errore.msg is always newer than msgtxt.inc (although it was working fine last 8 months).
Using 32-bit make, the trunk builds successfully. This software is truly a never-ending source of
surprises...
Regards,
Sergei
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list