[fpc-devel] Feature announcement: Extension of TThread's interface
patspiper
patspiper at gmail.com
Fri Dec 28 11:01:54 CET 2012
On 27/12/12 22:38, Ewald wrote:
> Hmmm, that;s indeed quite some different output you've got there. Mine
> looks like this:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 6
> model : 23
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8600 @ 3.33GHz
> stepping : 10
> microcode : 0xa07
> cpu MHz : 2000.000
> cache size : 6144 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 2
> core id : 0
> cpu cores : 2
> apicid : 0
> initial apicid : 0
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 13
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
> pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
> pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl
> aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16
> xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority
> bogomips : 6668.63
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 64
> address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management:
>
>
> (this is repeated twice, with only `processor:0` changing to
> `processor:1`)
>
>
> Since this is the same kind of output I got on several other linux
> distributions/architectures(--> 32 bit versus 64 bit intel), I assumed
> it was kinda `standard`. Then again assume = ...
>
> Well, anyway, it's a bit trickier than I thought at first in that case.
I guess one way of calculating the number of processors is to iterate
through every 'processor' in the list and add 1 if 'siblings' = 'cpu
cores' (no hyperthreading), and 0.5 if 'siblings' = 2 x 'cpu cores'
(hyperthreading enabled).
Despite your listing of cpuinfo is partial, one can deduce that you
don't have hyperthreading.
Stephano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20121228/035efe8d/attachment.html>
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list