[fpc-devel] Unicode proceedings

[Hans-Peter Diettrich]

Michael Schnell schrieb:
> As already said, my request at this time is not considering 
> implementation before agreeing on a decently clear definition of what 
> should be provided and what is supposed top happen when.

IMO such a separation is of no use. If you want an new string type, then 
make it a class, and add operators and other functionality as required. 
Then everybody can use his preferred class, and no decision about "the" 
string type is required.

DoDi