[fpc-devel] The future of fpmake

Marco van de Voort marcov at stack.nl
Thu Mar 31 22:06:37 CEST 2011


In our previous episode, Joost van der Sluis said:
> > That's why I mentioned "or any other structured format".
> 
> It's not a bad idea to see if we can make a structured (and readable)
> format to create our fpmake.pp files.

I think the problem goes deeper than this. Makefile.fpc doesn't list unit
dependancies (units and .inc files), and fpmake does.

It's this detail that is the bulk of the work (at least IMHO, Jonas?) not
the fact that one has to wrap p.targets.addunit() around it.



More information about the fpc-devel mailing list