[fpc-devel] volatile variables

[Michael Schnell]

On 06/28/2011 06:33 PM, Andrew Brunner wrote:
>>> Remember ***cores!=threads*** people.
>> Wrong regarding the issue in question (see the message by Jonas).
> I'm at a loss for words.  So you equate threads to cores?
>
A (Posix compliant) user software needs to consider each thread as 
running on it's own CPU and thus any concurrency to be allowed (e.g. 
expecting that a higher priority thread is not interrupted by a lower 
priority thread has to be considered erroneous.)

-Michael