[fpc-devel] 019605: Safety check for "const s: string" (similar to Range or Overflow checks)
flavio.etrusco at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 22:06:51 CEST 2011
>>> On top of what I already wrote on mantis. I believe my initial idea can
>>> be further simplified.
>>> Given: procedure Foo(const s1, s2: string);
>> What about records, arrays etc. containing ref. counted types?
> This case is shlighly different.
I suppose Florian already knows that, he just meant it's basically the
same programming/coding error. And also guess he meant "where do we
Maybe just adding the option to disable the const optimization and
letting the programmer figure out whether it fixes or not a bug is a
good enough addition?
More information about the fpc-devel