[fpc-devel] Re: JVM: class of XYZ => java.lang.Class
jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Sun Dec 25 20:53:35 CET 2011
On 25 Dec 2011, at 18:23, Sven Barth wrote:
> Ok, I could simply solve this by doing a typecast "JLClass(TTrainTypeActivity)",
That's indeed the proper way.
> but couldn't the compiler do this automatically? (as this looks a bit unclean to me...)
It completely clean. The better way to solve this would be to modify the javapp parser to generated overloaded versions of routines expecting a JLClass parameter with a version that accepts "class of JLObject" or similar parameters.
More information about the fpc-devel