[fpc-devel] FPC/Lazarus Rebuild performance
listmember at letterboxes.org
Sun Sep 12 18:59:56 CEST 2010
On 9/12/2010 12:41 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> In discussions with Hans, it is said that I/O is not a factor, since after
>> one run everything is cached anyway, and then in this thread I/O is to blame
>> for a huge difference in speed.
> Disk throughput doesn't really matter. Reading directory contents, getting file information and opening/closing files is another matter.
My exeperience seems to confirm this.
I ran the same tests with Lazarus install on a NAS.
As the connection was 2xGigabit (port-trunked), read/write speeds were
higher than my local HHD.
Yet, rebuild times doubled.
It seems latency plays a more significant role than thoughput.
More information about the fpc-devel