[fpc-devel] Re: enumerators

Michael Schnell mschnell at lumino.de
Mon Nov 15 11:12:16 CET 2010

On 11/15/2010 10:10 AM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> Actually, I do not think so. I believe that an integer containing the codepoint
> is preferable implementation.
OK, Unicode always blows up the complexity of the code greatly ;).

Your suggestion would result in an UTF-8 -> UCS32 translation and thus force

> Either way, of course, the quadratic complexity
> of for..to loop remains.
I don't thinks so. see the other mail regarding implementing a hidden  
loop pointer and a published loop variable (e.g. as an UTF-8 string).


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list