[fpc-devel] Syntax problem with function result
Hans-Peter Diettrich
DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
Wed Jul 28 15:24:44 CEST 2010
Jeppe Johansen schrieb:
[please quote inline]
>>> I wouldn't miss not having the name of the function as a result
>>> variable in mode objfpc, at all. I think it would be a valid
>>> addition, as a compiler directive that was turned on as default, as
>>> not to break existing code
>>
>> It would break the compiler itself.
>>
> How would it? As I wrote, I suggested that you should be able to disable
> the function name result variable with a compiler directive. That
> wouldn't break anything since normal code wouldn't have the compiler
> directive
It's all okay when the new directive is off, by default, or the actual
compiler project options (Makefile) turn it off.
> I attached a patch, that works as I suggested
Thanks, I'll check it, and possibly add it to my OO rewrite branch :-)
DoDi
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list