resolving namespace conflicts via project ? [Re: alternative aliases [Re: [fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Ideas for namespace implementation]]
fpc at mfriebe.de
Tue Jul 27 15:24:43 CEST 2010
On 27/07/2010 13:53, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 23:21, Martin<fpc at mfriebe.de> wrote:
>> On 27/07/2010 12:42, Martin wrote:
>>> Reffering to
> I think you have over-engineered it by far ;-)
Not sure about the "by far", but the rest is possible true.
However, it also has the purpose of getting the discussion going, and
seeing what everyone thinks.
Best is to have a complet list of possibilities, with explanations what
each feature can provide (and therefore what will not be without the
From that list a choice can be made.
Once that choice is made, and some one volunteers to implement, the
implementer can again discard part of the choice, and make it's own
to me one of the really important questions is: Should qualified unit
references in the source (outside the "uses") be allowed?
My answer is "no" => but that's only 2 cent (my 2 cent)
More information about the fpc-devel