[fpc-devel] is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility
marc at dommelstein.net
Tue Jul 27 00:13:17 CEST 2010
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 26 July 2010 22:57, Florian Klämpfl <florian at freepascal.org> wrote:
>> What makes you think so? Which compiler patches did we reject so far?
> Lets take some examples in the last few months alone. I had code for
> the RTL. Iterators come to mind - denied. Then there was a patch for a
> more cross-platform help type definition - denied. Then there was the
> discussion about adding Observer support to all container classes in
> the RTL. Refused again, but at least Michael saw the light and said he
> will add it to the RTL regardless (and time permitting). I can list a
> few more... and then some people still wonder why I rant about FPC
Florian asked about rejected *compiler* patches, not RTL.
More information about the fpc-devel