[fpc-devel] Namespaces [was: is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility]

Sven Barth pascaldragon at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 26 13:20:41 CEST 2010


On 26.07.2010 12:11, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
> If ever, I'd agree about (project wide) symbolic names for library
> directories. Then the file location is given once, in the program or
> package settings (search path), easily adoptable to any installation,
> and then a package unit can be qualified (fully optional) by the package
> name, to override the current unit search strategy.

Would you mind adding this idea to the Namespace-thread on fpc-pascal, 
so that there is one place of discussion? (I know that I'm not the list 
admin, thus it's only a suggestion ^^)


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list