[fpc-devel] is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility

[Martin]

On 25/07/2010 19:15, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 25 July 2010 19:28, Martin wrote:
>    
>> And the exact same can be said for longer unit names...
>>
>> fpgui.buttons
>> fpgui_buttons
>> FpguiButtons
>>      
> And with correct language support, we wouldn't need to make such ugly
> unit names.
>
>    
Yes, but that wasn't the original point of the discussion:

Those unitnames avoid conflicts, in the same way than namespaces do => 
the make the overall identifier of the unit longer.

no namespace is no longer about avoiding/reducing conflicts => it is 
about making it better looking (better defined by whom?)