[fpc-devel] is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility

Marco van de Voort marcov at stack.nl
Fri Jul 23 09:59:19 CEST 2010

In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> On 23 July 2010 03:46, Paul Ishenin <ip at kmiac.ru> wrote:
> >
> > What to do with the generics syntax? FPC do this so:
> >
> > ?generic TFPGList<T> = class(TFPSList)
> Please tell me this was only an example, and that FPC doesn't actually
> have a TFPGList class somewhere in the code. 'Tfpg' is the prefix I
> use for all classes in fpGUI Toolkit project- to reduce naming
> conflicts I had before with FPC.  I don't want to go through that
> again.

All generics types of FPC (in unit fgl)  are prefixed with tfpg, since 2006

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list