[fpc-devel] is that intended? private type section in classes versus visibility
Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Fri Jul 23 09:59:19 CEST 2010
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said:
> On 23 July 2010 03:46, Paul Ishenin <ip at kmiac.ru> wrote:
> >
> > What to do with the generics syntax? FPC do this so:
> >
> > ?generic TFPGList<T> = class(TFPSList)
>
> Please tell me this was only an example, and that FPC doesn't actually
> have a TFPGList class somewhere in the code. 'Tfpg' is the prefix I
> use for all classes in fpGUI Toolkit project- to reduce naming
> conflicts I had before with FPC. I don't want to go through that
> again.
All generics types of FPC (in unit fgl) are prefixed with tfpg, since 2006
already.
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list