[fpc-devel] arm embedded cortexM3 unrecognized opcode
jepjoh2 at kom.aau.dk
Tue Jul 13 17:48:07 CEST 2010
I think that'll only complicate things. I think the compiler should be
able to do anything, down to lowest level. Just like you have CLI, HLT,
FXSTOR, WRMSR, etc instruction support in x86
Hans-Peter Diettrich skrev:
> Geoffrey Barton schrieb:
>> It now recognises the mnemonic 'cpsie' but not the following 'i'.
>> The 'msr' instruction should also allow the interrupts to be
>> enabled/disabled as
>> msr primask,r0
>> but msr gives an unknown identifier error for 'primask' and all the
>> other 'special' register names ('apsr' etc.) Perhaps they have been
>> given different names, but I cannot find them listed anywhere in the
>> FPC source.
> I don't know details about this CPU, but possibly priviledged
> operations (and registers) are not part of the CPU definition, because
> these cannot be used in ordinary applications.
> It may be a good idea to create multiple code generators, for machines
> that can be used either for non-priviledged (application) or
> privileged (system, driver...) coding. At least a priviledge level
> should be passed to the compiler and assembler, so that it can flag
> the need for privileged instructions in the given source code.
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
More information about the fpc-devel