Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Tue Jan 26 13:18:18 CET 2010
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
> On 01/26/2010 12:49 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > Note that syncobjs is libc based (via cthreads basicevent*) on *nix, and
> > wholly portable (also to windows).
> Ooops, that would mean I would not improve things when replacing direct
> libc binding by syncobj binding ?
If you mean that it would still link to libc yes.
> Many thanks for pointing this out !
> What do you suggest for doing mutex and similar things ?
2) if it _has_ to be libc free, unit ipc
3) explain here why the above two are not good enough.
More information about the fpc-devel