[fpc-devel] fpdoc's RTF output

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

> On 24 August 2010 16:48, Marco van de Voort  wrote:
>> routines, and dwlinear were never updated properly. Do similar links look ok
>> in the latex output? It makes more sense to compare ipf output with that?
>
> I can now confirm that *all* Linear output writers have this bug.
> Below is the same help text example as the IPF one. Note that the
> pageref links don't actually point to the correct location, the simply
> point to the "fcl" package itself.  See the pageref details for the
> CreatePipeStreams and TOutpuPipeStream in the See Also section...
>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> % TInputPipeStream
> \section{TInputPipeStream}
> \label{fcl:pipes:tinputpipestream}
> \index{TInputPipeStream}
> % Description
> \subsection{Description}
> \var{TInputPipeStream} is created by the CreatePipeStreams
> (\pageref{fcl}) call to represent the reading end of a pipe.  It is a
> TStream (\pageref{../rtl/classes/tstream.html}) descendent which does
> not allow writing, and which mimics the seek operation.
> \begin{FPCList}
> \SeeAlso
> TStream (\pageref{../rtl/classes/tstream.html}),
> CreatePipeStreams (\pageref{fcl}),
> TOutputPipeStream (\pageref{fcl})\end{FPCList}
> ------------------------------------------
>
>
> Only good thing so far, is that now I know it's not a IPF specific issue. :-)

I looked at it, and I've seen where the problem is. I'll try and fix it
tonight.

Michael.