[fpc-devel] Proposal: Enhanced replacement for assignment operators
Adem
listmember at letterboxes.org
Fri Aug 6 18:48:22 CEST 2010
On 2010-08-06 1:23 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> Correct.
I agree.
> That is why reducing it to a required minimum is a good thing.
I agree with the idea.
But, not with the proposal.
Not the way it is made, anyway.
Why not come up with a small application/utility that caters for the
opposition?
IOW, write a small/simple utility that converts a given source to/from
those shorthand operators to/from their long form.
If there was such a thing and if it produced code that compiled to give
identical results, I would have no problems with the proposal.
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list