[fpc-devel] Proposal: Enhanced replacement for assignment operators

Adem listmember at letterboxes.org
Fri Aug 6 18:48:22 CEST 2010

  On 2010-08-06 1:23 PM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
> Correct.
I agree.
> That is why reducing it to a required minimum is a good thing.
I agree with the idea.

But, not with the proposal.

Not the way it is made, anyway.

Why not come up with a small application/utility that caters for the 

IOW, write a small/simple utility that converts a given source to/from 
those shorthand operators to/from their long form.

If there was such a thing and if it produced code that compiled to give 
identical results, I would have no problems with the proposal.

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list