[fpc-devel] Proposal: Enhanced replacement for assignment operators
Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Fri Aug 6 12:31:53 CEST 2010
In our previous episode, Alexander Klenin said:
> >> I always think that the extra punctuation is bad for readability.
> > punctuation is not even 100% required to understand natural language.
> Correct. That is why reducing it to a required minimum is a good thing.
It is not, for the same reason all redundancy is not stripped from natural
languages either. It improves reading speed and integrity at only a small
> They never did and probably never will
They work perfectly fine.
> (at least, I do not think there is a need to extend them, since a better
> alternative, assignment operators, is already implemented).
I don't see the need for them. I can see the logical ones being implemented
for ease of conversion in e.g. compression code, but I never use them.
More information about the fpc-devel