[fpc-devel] Delphi smart-linking perspective ( Language change and implementation ... )

Florian Klaempfl florian at freepascal.org
Sun May 31 21:21:59 CEST 2009


Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> In our previous episode, Florian Klaempfl said:
>>> theoretically be instantiated. On the other hand, I read that recently 
>>> the LCL was restructured a bit to improve the situation, so maybe the 
>>> results would be better now.
>>>
>>> Also note that WPO can do little about published methods (since it must 
>>> assume that these can all be called via RTTI).
>> Maybe the IDE can feedback some info about used classes and methods?
> 
> In time, a pascal analyser would be a good thing to have. I think analysis
> of smartlinking is more something for an analyzer than the compiler itself
> (though the compiler could generate certain datafiles obviously).

This won't help lazarus. For lazarus, also the contents of the lfms is
important.



More information about the fpc-devel mailing list