[fpc-devel] first results of using fpc resources instead of lazarus resources

Marco van de Voort marcov at stack.nl
Tue Dec 1 09:36:40 CET 2009

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:59:45PM +0100, Giulio Bernardi wrote:
> >> perfectly now. Can it save without the BOM even if file had it before?
> > 
> > Yes, that would be possible.
> > 
> > But I think this should be fixed in fpcres. Otherwise windows
> > users editing the lfm files will easily run into this error. 
> > 
> Fixed in rev 14292.
> I had to fix TParser too, since fcl-res uses ObjectTextToBinary to compile 
> dfm/xfm/lfm files.

Is this a single revision and do you think it is mergable?

This is the last week that high-priority stuff can be merged to 2.4.0, and
since the new resource support is a highlight of 2.4.0, this could be a

More information about the fpc-devel mailing list