[fpc-devel] Re: Bug in revision 9781/2
marc at dommelstein.net
Sat Jan 19 16:47:24 CET 2008
Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Sat, 19 Jan 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe:
>> On 19 Jan 2008, at 15:54, Peter Vreman wrote:
>>> This call and pop is old-style PIC and not good for new cpus because
>>> it breaks the call-stack. Please use the new style that calls a
>>> function (fpc_geteipasebx). This also generated by the compiler. See
>>> i386/cgcpu.pas and search for g_maybe_got_init.
>> I recently read that on the more recent processors, call/pop is
>> slightly faster again (I suppose they detect a call to next
>> instruction and don't add it to the internal call stack or so).
> Intel cpu's since Pentium M and AMD cpu's since Barcelona indeed have a
> stack analyzer. I'm still going to switch back to the fpc_geteipasebx
> helper since the extra call/ret penalty on those processors is small
> while the penalty of a broken call stack is large.
Just for my information, this callstack, is it "tracked" by the CPU or
generated by FPC. I somehow fail to see why a call&pop will affect the
callstack in case it is generated.
More information about the fpc-devel