[fpc-devel] Odd question?

Jonas Maebe jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Thu Oct 18 16:21:50 CEST 2007

On 18 Oct 2007, at 16:17, mm wrote:

> The inlined code shouldn't be much bigger than the calls to "Odd 
> ()". So,
> why aren't they inlined? Is there a reason you did so?

It's because the Odd function is an assembler function, and the  
compiler can't yet inline assembler functions. I guess this stems  
from the time that the compiler was not very good at inlining nor at  
removing stack frames. I would probably be best to simply remove all  
assembler implementations of Odd() from the rtl so the generic Pascal  
version is used instead (which can be inlined).


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list