[fpc-devel] confusion in FPC version numbers
Tomas Hajny
XHajT03 at mbox.vol.cz
Tue Mar 27 09:52:31 CEST 2007
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
> I am a bit confused with the FPC version numbers in SubVersion.
> Obviously I just don't know or understand how the version numbers in
> FPC work. I do know even numbers are stable and odd numbers unstable.
> The version increments is still a mystery.
;-) Actually, I believe the scheme is described on our WWW pages (FAQ?).
> Why has the /Fixes_2_2 branch got a version number 2.1.3? The name is
> very misleading. Why not 2.1.2 or 2.2.0? Or is 2.2.0 reserved for
> the day it actually gets released?
Yes, 2.2.0 will be released later based on sources in that branch (after
proper testing/stabilization). 2.1.2 is being prepared as a beta release
right now, so the continuing updates are getting to 2.1.3.
> What is the version number of /trunk now? 2.2.1? 2.1.4?
2.3.1 (i.e. further progress beyond 2.2.x).
Tomas
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list