[fpc-devel] confusion in FPC version numbers
Jonas Maebe
jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Tue Mar 27 09:51:23 CEST 2007
On 27 mrt 2007, at 09:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Why has the /Fixes_2_2 branch got a version number 2.1.3? The name is
> very misleading. Why not 2.1.2 or 2.2.0?
Even version numbers are reserved for releases (either internal/
external releases), i.e. they correspond to a single source tree
which is tagged. 2.1.2 has been tagged already for internal release
building testing. 2.1.4 will be the first public beta for 2.2
> Or is 2.2.0 reserved for
> the day it actually gets released?
Yes.
> What is the version number of /trunk now? 2.2.1? 2.1.4?
2.3.1
Jonas
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list