[fpc-devel] language extensions
mschnell at lumino.de
Tue Jul 3 15:05:17 CEST 2007
> We already have the generics can the preprocessor symbols. That leaves the
> "for in". The development team has its doubts about the "for in"
> construct, but:
> * Andreas did it in a reasonably clean way with a lot less hacks and
> ugly constructions than Delphi did.
> * The pressure on us is increasing to have a "for in".
AFAIK, Chrome does extended "for in" or similar stuff.
Case-string seems very handy in many cases and does not look like
More information about the fpc-devel